Jimmy Carter II
In Ronald Reagan’s autobiography he recounts how the Shah of Iran assured his supporters that Jimmy Carter and the United States would come to the rescue and that there was no need to crack-down on the Islamic terrorists lead by Ayatollah Khomeini. The Shah held that despite all his faults, he had been a loyal ally to the United States. We all know how that ended. Sadly, the pathetic Carter administration let the Shah fall. As a direct result of Jimmy Carter’s criminal incompetence, Iran went from being a strategic ally to the world’s foremost enabler of terrorism. 30 years after the Carter debacle America is plagued with an equally incompetent president: Barack Obama.
In a chilling article in The Australian Greg Sheridan details how Obama has accepted the inevitability of a nuclear Iran. Think about what you have just read. General Petraeus recently explained to congress that Iran is training Taliban leaders and is co-operating with al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Iran is developing a missile program to carry nuclear warheads that can already strike Europe. Mahamoud Ahmadinijad, the Hitler of the Middle East, has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel of the map. He hosts a ‘Holocaust didn’t happen’ conference. He is a fanatic supporter of a splinter death-cult that believes the 12th Imam will be revealed only after the world has descended into widespread chaos. Ahmadinijad went so far as to widen the streets of Tehran in anticipation of the return of the 12 Imam. Taking all of that into account, President Obama has decided that he can accept this country obtaining nuclear weapons.
According to Sheridan, Obama was hell-bent on embarrassing Israel, and specifically Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in order to make it impossible for Israel to act unilaterally in defending herself. From Sheridan’s article:
By so isolating Israel, by irresponsibly unleashing a global wave of anti-Israel sentiment, especially in nations which normally support Israel, Obama has made the possibility of Israel considering unilateral action against Iran much more unlikely. The Israelis would weigh such action very carefully. There are many pluses and minuses. By creating the impression of Israel as a besieged, isolated and reckless nation, which the wildly disproportionate reaction to the East Jerusalem apartments accomplished, Obama has made the potential cost to Israel of action against Iran much greater.
The Obama administration no longer says “all options are on the table.” Instead, Obama touts his “I don’t want to meddle in domestic affairs” line (a courtesy NOT granted to Israel when it came to building in the nation’s capital). Hillary Clinton, the darling of the most recent American Israel Public Affairs Committee, will not mention the military option anymore. Instead, Hillary said “our aim is not incremental sanctions, but sanctions that will bite.” However, the Wall Street Journal reported just a week after Secretary Clinton reassured her faithful that “the U.S. has backed away from pursuing a number of tough measures against Iran in order to win Russian and Chinese support for one more U.N. sanctions resolution.” By the time that support arrives there will be a radioactive crater where Israel once was.
Even if, God willing, Obama is replaced by an adult in 2012, his reckless actions in the international sphere will have long-term repercussions. America’s credibility will be shot. Allies, already weary due to the signs of weakness conveyed by the United States, will see that the country let one of her loyalist and most important allies fall in the fruitless and discredited pursuit of appeasement. In December of 2001 Osama Bin Laden said “when people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse.” Will anyone consider Barack Obama’s America the stronger horse?
Barack Obama is Jimmy Carter’s second term. Carter began the disaster in Iran and now it appears as though Obama is going to finish the job. Democrats cannot be trusted. They throw loyal allies under the bus and appease the enemies of freedom. This is what the United Sates used to say about appeasement when the adults were still in charge:
Tags: Afghanistan, al Qaeda, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Iran, Israel, Jimmy Carter, Pakistan, Ronald Reagan




April 6th, 2010 at 2:19 pm
This dude is ridiculous. He never ceases to amaze me. At least we’ll be able to get rid of Reid soon enough.
April 6th, 2010 at 3:35 pm
That’s the biggest load of warm-and-runny hog slop that I’ve read in quite some time. Outrageous propaganda.
Are you a distant relative of Josef Goebbels?
April 6th, 2010 at 5:28 pm
Fantastic. Obama wants to allow a man that denies the Holocaust and threatens to “wipe Israel off the map” to nuke up and we get comments like Allan’s. Responses like that make me question the notion that everyone deserves the right to vote.
April 7th, 2010 at 4:40 am
Obama is Jimmy Carter on steroids. Worse, he hates America on top of being Jimmy Carter II
April 7th, 2010 at 8:32 am
Yeah Obama’s awful what we really need is to live in the past and worship the dumbass Reagan with his tax-hikes and Nazi policies.
You right wing nutjobs are unbeleivable.
April 7th, 2010 at 2:59 pm
“dumbass Reagan with his tax-hikes and Nazi policies.”
Brilliant points. Reagan was a real tax-hiker, how could I have missed that? And who could forget his Nazi policies. Say, wasn’t it a prominent Republican that was recalled from the Court of St. James because he was a Nazi sympathizer? O right, that was Joseph P. Kennedy Sr., the patriarch of the Kennedy family. My side didn’t praise Mussolini, or hang a picture of him for inspiration – yours did.
You left-wing loons have a viewpoint that requires absolute ignorance, something you appear to be in complete compliance with.
April 7th, 2010 at 6:04 pm
Look, Ari, before you were even born I’d travelled around the world four times, visiting 42 countries, including three prolonged trips to the Middle East where I stayed in Israel, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and Iraq.
I can usually tolerate arrogance or incompetence on their own. Combined, however, they are intolerable.
You, Ari, are both incompetent and arrogant.